009——Build log——Updated weekly

Progress,
in public.

A running log of what we're building, testing, and learning. Published as things happen — no polish, no press releases. The honest version.

S1 · FoundationsIn progress
Prototype + patent
S2 · ValidationQueued
Phantom testing
S3 · Pilot
Human testing
S4 · Market
Launch
Filter
Latest update

Launching the public build log.

Going public with progress. The goal: treat this like a wet-lab notebook anyone can read. Trainers, clinicians, and investors shouldn't have to wait for a pitch deck to see what we're working on — they should be able to watch the prototype take shape, week by week.

Next up: finishing the 2D pyEIT mesh, filing the provisional patent, and running the first Hilbert-Huang pass on a clean reference signal to baseline the denoising before we touch the phantom.

#public-build#dev-log#transparency

First pyEIT 2D circular mesh running locally.

Got a 16-electrode 2D circular reconstruction mesh building end-to-end in pyEIT. Forward model solves in ~40ms on synthetic data. Inverse reconstruction still has edge artifacts near the boundary electrodes — expected, working on regularization next.

  • 16 nodes on the outer ring, uniform spacing
  • Gauss-Newton inverse solver, single step for now
  • Synthetic phantom with two conductivity inclusions for testing
pyEITreconstructionpython

Bench-top electrode ring — v0 assembled.

Ugly but functional. 16 electrodes on an adjustable strap, breadboarded multiplexer, bench power supply. Not going on anyone's arm yet — this is just to verify we can inject current across arbitrary pairs and measure the voltage differential everywhere else cleanly.

Early reading: SNR is noisier than I want at low injection amplitudes. Candidate fix list: better shielding on the measurement lines, moving to differential amps, and — the big one — letting HHT do its job on the output.

v0-hardwaremultiplexerbenchtop

Reading week: HHT on biomedical signals.

Deep dive into the original NASA HHT papers plus recent biomedical applications. The empirical mode decomposition step is the interesting one for us — unlike FFT it doesn't assume stationarity, which is perfect for the kind of quasi-random noise you get through muscle tissue.

Key takeaway: the intrinsic mode functions cluster predictably when the injected signal is clean. Noise ends up isolated in the highest-frequency IMFs and can be dropped without touching the signal band.

HHTEMDliterature-review

Pre-seed raise — kicking off.

Opened conversations for the $60K pre-seed round. Structure: convertible notes, 20% discount, $4M cap. Target close by end of Q2. First meetings scheduled with two university-affiliated funds and one solo angel in the sports-tech space.

fundraisepre-seed

University partner conversations.

Three initial conversations with university sports-medicine departments about a potential pilot. Consistent theme: trainers want objective tissue data, not another wearable that spits out step counts. That's the wedge — replacing subjective palpation with a repeatable impedance map.

pilot-scopinguser-research

Electrode material shortlist.

Sourcing comparison done. Tested three candidates for dry-contact electrodes: conductive silicone, stainless steel pads, and carbon-loaded fabric. Fabric wins on comfort + repeatability, silicone wins on conductivity. Leaning silicone for the phantom setup, fabric for the eventual wearable sleeve.

electrodessourcingv1-prep

Project officially underway.

EIT-tek is live. Scope for the next 90 days: hardware v0, 2D reconstruction pipeline, HHT on example data, and a provisional patent filing. Everything after that — phantom validation, NASA licensing, pilot testing — waits on that foundation.

kickoffS1-start
No entries match that filter.